Reagent / Law firms
Set clear boundaries for AI in client work.
Client confidentiality makes context essential. Use Reagent to understand observed internal AI use, then define the evidence, policies, and permissions your firm needs.
Choose a starting pointStart with a real workflow.
Select a part of your firm’s AI use to see the available evidence and the decisions to make before extending access.
Which AI tools are being used, and which uses has the firm approved?
- The workflow
Drafting and research
Attorneys and staff use AI assistants to research, summarize, and prepare work.
- The available evidence
- Identity and SaaS audits
- AI sign-ups, OAuth grants, and account activity where the source exposes them.
- AI platform connections
- Usage or compliance events supported by your provider and plan.
- The review decision
Agree approved tools, permitted data, and the person responsible for reviewing a newly discovered use.
Review identity connections
These are review pathways. Visibility depends on connected telemetry and source support. Response actions depend on integration support and granted permissions.
Agree on the conditions before rollout.
Scope the work
Identify the people, tools, and internal workflows in scope. Record where client or matter data could enter the process.
Assign review ownership
Decide who reviews a new AI tool, who approves an exception, and how security and legal owners share evidence.
Check the evidence
Confirm which events each connection supplies, whether content is available, and how missing telemetry will be handled.
Choose response authority
Review read and write permissions separately. Define when a finding needs a person and which actions may run automatically.
Bring a workflow and your current stack.
We can review where Reagent fits, what the connections can observe, and the policy and response choices your firm needs to make.